The “Evil Globalization” & the Central Dialectic Tug-of-War in the New Globalization’s Shaping
Over the recent years there has been internationally a tremendous increase in the number of people engaged in the very concept of globalization and the economic crisis. This largely prolongs a lot of infertile conflict between some opposing “entrenched camps”, in scientific as well as social and political terms. Unfortunately, this process of thought takes a character, most often, extreme, dogmatic, and aphoristic. This article is structured in a way to:
- First, unravel the threads of globalization dynamics, of their development and crisis, and to establish a basic analytical framework towards the search for a “new globalization”.
- Second, investigate the structural socio-economic opposing views of global dynamics (the tug of war between the critical dimensions of Globalization) that advance always in an evolutionary way.
- Third, based on the available data, evaluate the most significant accomplishments, of every area of interest, which derive from the Globalization evolutionary procedure.
- In the end, rewrite the main directions that a modern socioeconomic global intervention requires in terms of moving the world system towards a new phase of development, which we call the “New Globalization”.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work three (3) months after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).